BREAKING- Hillary’s Robotic Answers Explained -She’s a Presidential Puppet

Presidential Puppet

Hillary’s Robotic Answers Explained

by Beverley Russell – Op-ed senior columnist Trumpville Report

Presidential Puppet? Hillary Wore Earpiece Radio Receiver During Live TV town-hall Event, Had Answers Fed to Her! If you watched the town hall last night, you now know what kind of naggy, bitchy housewife tone Hillary intends to take with the country, for the next four or even eight years, if the system makes her president. But she can’t even do election town halls without having answers and cues fed to her through an earpiece… so how is she going to be president?

Oh, that’s right, a Presidential Puppet is just what America needs

New York City has confirmed with sources in the NYPD, that Clinton was using a very expensive earpiece receiver to receive stealth communications from her campaign handlers during Wednesday’s Presidential Forum, carried live on NBC.

While Clinton was fielding questions from NBC’s Matt Lauer, and the public Wednesday night, on live television, a quiet buzz started circulating in New York law enforcement circles about Hillary’s left ear. NYPD sources confirm Clinton was wearing an ‘inductive earpiece,” the same technology employed by almost all lead Broadway actors to receive forgotten lines and stealth off-stage cues from directors.

The skin-tone piece Clinton was wearing, however, was somewhat different from the standard issued stealth earpiece and is much different in appearance from a hearing aid. This unit is considered a “micro” earbud, which contains all the technology but is a fraction of the size with a very high price tag. In fact, most of the units this size, approximately 3mm or comparable to a small pearl stud earring, are normally issued to law enforcement or corporate security teams.

Ironically, the revelation that Clinton was wearing such a unit might have only been recognized because of astute NYPD officers, attached to her security details who are accustomed to seeing the stealth apparatus, at stage shows and security personnel of VIPs and international dignitaries, at the United nations and elsewhere in the five boroughs. Likewise, NYPD detectives use a parallel technology to communicate during undercover Ops.

Based on experts familiar with the technology, the stealth earpiece operates on a bandwidth from 300 Hz to 4KHz. Many such units are powered by SONY. The range of the unit can be unlimited depending on how the back-end is set up. Technically, you could receive cues from 100 feet away or someone sitting in Washington D.C., experts said. The set up and range is flexible based on need and use.

Whether the device is Clinton’s own communication device, something provided by NBC, or a hearing aid is unclear. It’s also unknown whether such a device, if it is Clinton’s own, would be a violation of the rules of yesterday’s Commander-In-Chief forum.

“NYPD sources involved with the NBC forum’s security detail confirm, Clinton was wearing an ‘inductive earpiece,” the same technology employed by almost all lead Broadway actors, to receive forgotten lines and stealth off-stage cues from directors. The flesh-colored ear bud is easily concealed. There are no wires running directly to the ear like you see with the units employed by Secret Service protection detail personnel,”.

The story also drew almost a thousand comments, with one user commenting, “Either she admits a health issue and says she’s deaf or she admits to cheating.”

Earlier during the Town Hall, several watching, said her responses seemed a little slower than normal. Now it all makes sense,”.

Another user remarked that Hillary appeared to be uttering broken sentences such as “I think that’s an ex—actly right way to go ahead.”

Others claims it’s merely a reflection of studio lights. You be the judge.

New York cops working security at the forum saw Clinton wearing a high-tech “inductive earpiece” so aides backstage could help her answer questions.

Could it have been an optical illusion or even a hearing aid?

Conservative actor James Woods drew attention the issue with the simple question, “Earpiece?” and a close up image of Hillary from last night’s forum.

Woods also posted a Clinton email from the Wikileaks archive in which Huma Abedin asked Hillary, “Did u take your earpiece or do I need to get it?”

“She literally can’t help herself. She’s the kind of sociopath who will lie even if the truth were more beneficial,” added Woods, linking to an article by ‘True Pundit’ which reported that Hillary was wearing an earpiece to receive “stealth coaching” during the NBC live town hall event.

Once again Hillary, the ‘Presidential Puppet’, is caught CHEATING her way toward the White House.

Meanwhile, Clinton was taking heat for saying Wednesday, “We are not putting ground troops into Iraq ever again and we are not putting ground troops into Syria.”

As of Thursday, there already are 4,460 U.S. troops on the ground in Iraq, according to the Pentagon, with 400 having arriving over the Labor Day weekend. There are roughly 300 U.S. special operations forces on the ground in Syria.

This is not the first time Clinton has faced charges that she was wearing an earpiece during a crucial event, similar claims were made after her appearance in front of the House Select Benghazi Hearing in October last year.

Of course, the earpiece could have just been a hearing aid, although there doesn’t appear to be any admission or record of Hillary wearing one in the past.

Presidential Puppet Hillary can’t speak on her own

Does Hillary have no ideal what she’s talking about, or is this just another lie from crooked Hillary? Could Hillary be receiving answers to the tough questions, via her ear piece? And if it is just a hearing aid, why not confess it?

Hillary is nothing more than a puppet, with her strings being pulled by the puppet master himself, George Soros. Hillary’s closest advisors are, either Muslims, or plants by Soros, Hillary is just a figure-head for the destruction of America.

With all the corruption, how can anyone even consider voting for such a fraud? We know she lied about, Benghazi, emails, and every question asked of her. We no Hillary appears sick, with coughing fits, having to helped up and down stairs, and her so-called short circuiting.

Can America allow, a sick, lying, crook, to become Commander and Chief? Not on Trump’s watch!


by Beverley Russell – Op-ed senior columnist Trumpville Report

2 Comments on BREAKING- Hillary’s Robotic Answers Explained -She’s a Presidential Puppet

  1. Hillary’s supporters could care less if she’s a cheater, or a liar, or a crook. They just don’t seem to care. That is really scarey! Don’t forget to wear your red shirt or jacket when you vote. We want a fair election.

  2. You must read this to fully comprehend what Hillary Clinton has done.
    If you read nothing else read paragraph number 7.

    Date: January 30, 2016 at 11:41:52 AM EST
    Subject: Hillary’s Classified Information Breech
    There have been suggestions that all this kerfuffle over Hillary’s security breech has been politically motivated. But it is a fact that what we know already is a punishable offense, and the seriousness of the breach may be even worse than originally reported, despite the desultory mutterings from the White House that there is nothing there to warrant an indictment.

    The attached tutorial from a retired U.S. Army officer on the federal government’s classification system will be helpful in understanding
    the seriousness of Clinton ’s careless and blatant breaches of it, and what it says about her competence, judgement, and trustworthiness to be the Chief Executive of the Land. Les

    WHAT ALL AMERICANS NEED TO KNOW ABOUT HILLARY CLINTON’S ALLEGED SAP COMPROMISE:

    My name is Ed Coet. I am a retired US Army Intelligence Officer. In my last job in the army I was the Chief of the Human Intelligence Branch for the US European Command in Stuttgart , Germany . In that capacity I was also the Designated Program Manager for a Special Access Program (SAP) like the SAP that Hillary Clinton is alleged to have compromised in the most recent State Department Inspector General report to congress and which has been widely reported in the news. Here is what I personally know about SAP’s and what I can attest to in an unclassified forum:

    1. The names of each SAP are themselves classified Top Secret because the information within the SAP are far and above Top Secret.

    2. SAP’s are so sensitive that even people who have security clearances giving them access to Top Secret Sensitive Compartment Information (TS SCI), an enormously high security clearance level, cannot have accesses to a SAP’s unless they receive a special indoctrination into the SAP based on an operational “must know” that exceeds all other “need to know” standards.

    3. Being “read on” for a SAP is far more then acknowledging in writing that you have been briefed on the SAP. It is an in-depth “indoctrination” into the given SAP, and each SAP is itself compartmented separately from other SAPS. Having access to one SAP does not give you access to another SAP, and in fact rarely does. Only a tiny handful of people have knowledge of all SAP’s. SAP’s are the most stringently compartmented and protected information in the entire US government.

    4. Unlike Top Secret SCI which is maintained in highly secure Sensitive Compartmented Information Facilitates (SCIF’s) managed by specially trained Special Security Officers (SSO’s) at various levels of command, every single SAP is managed by an individually designated Program Manager for each individual SAP covering an entire theater of operations. In other words, SAP Program Managers are far fewer in number than there is SSO’s. SSO’s are not cleared to even know about SAP’s or to maintain information about them in their already enormously secure SCIF’s. How SAP’s are secured cannot be discussed because of the sensitive beyond Top Secret nature in which it is done.

    5. Unlike individuals with the highest Top Secret SCI access security clearances, who must undergo a special background information with periodic “bring-up” background investigation, those tiny few who have access to SAP’s must also endure periodic polygraph tests in addition to the most comprehensive of special background investigations. I used to have to schedule four-star generals and admirals to be polygraphed in order for them to maintain their access to my SAP. Many generals and admirals who obviously have the highest security clearances still did not rate being indoctrinated into my SAP. In fact, they didn’t even know the SAP existed.

    6. Compromise of a SAP is the single most dangerous security violation that can ever happen to the USA . Even the enormously damaging revelations of the Ed ward Snowden’s TOP Secret SCI security compromise does not reach the level of a SAP compromise.

    7. To put SAP information in to an unsecure sever like Hillary Clinton’s unsecure server is a class one felony that could, in some cases, result in life in prison. That is because such a compromise is so dangerous that it could and likely will result in the death of people protected by and within the scope of the SAP.

    As a former SAP Program Manager I believe it is inconceivable that if it is verified that Hillary Clinton’s server actually had SAP information on it that she could possibly escape indictment and criminal prosecution. As hard as it is to imagine, that would even be worse then electing to not prosecute a mass murdering serial killer because even they could not inflict as much damage on our country as the compromise of a SAP. Compromise of a SAP not only could — but without doubt would — cause serious damage to our national security.

    If it is true that Hillary Clinton had SAP information on her unsecure server, whether it was marked or not, you can be sure that the FBI will strongly recommend that charges be brought against Hillary Clinton and continue in an exhaustive investigation to trace back to every single person that had even the tiniest role in this unbelievable security compromise.
    If the Attorney General, through “prosecutorial discretion,” elected not to prosecute this crime, I believe congress would have no alternative but to impeach her, and the FBI would then have no choice but to conduct a criminal investigation of her for a deliberate cover up –- so grave is this security violation.

    If President Obama were to pardon Hillary Clinton for a compromise of this magnitude he would render himself in the historical record as an “enemy of the state,” and could himself face criminal prosecution –- so grave is such a security compromise. Nobody, not even the POTUS could gets away with something like this in our system of government. If anyone could escape persecution for compromising a SAP, we are deep trouble as a nation. No president who loves this country and is true to his oath would ever allow anyone, not even his or her closest and most loved relative, to get away with a SAP compromise. It is simply unimaginable that this could ever happen.
    If the ongoing investigation finds that Hillary Clinton compromised a SAP, then we all should know with certainty, regardless of political persuasion, that she is entirely unfit to hold public office of any kind let alone President of the USA — and ALL Americans should never tolerate it. Compromising a SAP is an absolute “disqualifier” for public office and access to our nations most sensitive information – period.

    ED COET
    Major , US Army (Retired)

    P.S. It is my sincere hope that each of you will share this article, to help other Americans understand how grave Hillary Clinton’s alleged SAP compromise is. We can’t allow anyone so careless with this level of information to have access to any classified information ever again for as long as she lives. This would surely render her unqualified and unfit to hold any public office let alone POTUS if this allegation proves to be true.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: